Two answers:
• President Barack Obama's worldview insists that all problems are resolvable by talking and making concessions. He also fears confrontation. This mix of naivete and spineless are very dangerous for us and laughable to our enemies.
• The desire to keep Russia on board. But we know Russia won't support sanctions or serious pressure on Iran. Moscow wants America to fail internationally and views Iran as an ally.
So America's policy is being held hostage by a president with no experience and little understanding of international affairs, a set of ideas making failure inevitable, trying to please a country which is an ally of the adversary and mis-estimating a dictatorial regime with cataclysmic ambitions and an overabundance of self-confidence.
What a mess! But how long into 2010 can they spin this before Washington recognizes that talks are going nowhere? My guess: probably not until Iran finishes its "bomb." At that point, Obama's fallback position as already been stated: "containment!" I'm sure that will go better than it did in our strategy with North Korea!
Three more little PROBLEMS:
First, containment requires high levels of US credibility. That means Iran's regime must believe that aggression will bring US retaliation up to using nuclear weapons itself. Will President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's regime tremble before Obama?
Third, and perhaps most important, Iran's increased power in having nuclear weapons will not consist merely of firing them off. The entire Arab world will be united out of fear. Western appeasement will remove any moderate Arab hope of survival. Radical Islam will rule! Terrorism will have free reign against dissident Muslims as well as the infidel west. Iran's radical regime is bent on nothing less than the cataclysmic event that will usher in the return of the Mahdi.
